St. Joseph & Iowa Railroad v. Cudmore

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• observing that Miranda addresses Fifth Amendment protection against compulsory self-incrimination rather than Fourth Amendment protection against unreasonable searches and seizures
• holding defendant had no reasonable expectation of privacy in curtilage to his home when there was no gate, he had not posted “no trespassing” signs and the driveway was visible from the street
• noting potential for abuse in the knock and talk procedure

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).