St. Joe Paper Co. v. Nickelson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that binding precedent is a “decision that ‘must be followed when similar circumstances arise’ ”
• stating that binding precedent is a “decision that ‘must be followed when similar circumstances arise’”
• finding the charge when read as a whole, accurately reflected that doctors are liable if they deviate from the standard of care, but if a judgment turns out to be wrong the doctor cannot automatically be found negligent
• discussing section 65.37 and corresponding limitations on use of unpublished memorandum decisions
• discussing section 65.37 and corresponding limitations on use of unpublished memorandum decisions
• affirming Judge Glazer’s deletion of almost identical language from Pa. SSJI (Civ

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).