S.T. Hudson Engineers, Inc. v. Camden Hotel Development Associates

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that...“the alter ego theory of piercing the corporate veil., .applies where the individual or corporate owner controls the corporation to be pierced, and the controlling owner is to be held liable.”
• applying a six-year limitation period for a claim to pierce the corporate veil, after determining it was the appropriate limitations period for the underlying breach of contract action
• applying a six-year limitation period for a claim to pierce the corporate veil, after determining it was the appropriate limitations period for the underlying breach of contract action
• the court recognized “the alter ego theory of piercing the corporate veil, a theory which applies where the individual or corporate owner controls the corporation to be pierced, and the controlling owner is to be held liable.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).