St. David's Healthcare Partnership, L.P., LLP v. Esparza

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding, in suit alleging premises liability, that “[t]he trial court should have dismissed Esparza’s claim for failure to comply with the expert report requirements of the TMLA”
• finding that permitting lubricating gel to fall and remain on the floor is inseparable from procedures for the disposition of gloves in a hospital and arises from accepted standards that should have been performed by the hospital during the patient’s care
• “directly related to health care” modifies “safety”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).