St. Croix v. University of Colorado Health Sciences Center

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that different treatment of similarly situated employees may be evidence of pretext
• noting it is not the court’s role in an anti-discrimination case to second guess an employer’s business judgment
• noting it is not the court’s role in an anti-discrimination case to second guess an employer’s business judgment
• plaintiff not similarly situated to comparator because plaintiff was on probation and subject to different standards than comparator
• “Failure to authenticate a document or otherwise submit evidence establishing its admissibility precludes consideration of the document for purposes of summary judgment.”
• “The issue is not whether the reasons for [the employment decision] were ‘wise, fair, or correct,’ but whether the employer believed those reasons to be true and whether the employer acted upon those reasons in good faith.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).