St. Croix Renaissance Grp., L.L. L.P. v. Abraham

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that Ross “fram[es] the exception issue entirely within the context of whether administrative remedies were actually available to the aggrieved inmate”
• holding that the PLRA “requires proper exhaustion, which means using all steps that the prison grievance system holds out” (citations, alterations, and quotation marks omitted)
• holding that the Supreme Court’s decision in Ross “fram[es] the exception issue entirely within the context of whether administrative remedies were actually available to the aggrieved inmate.”
• holding that a grievance process was unavailable because it was so confusing that it was incapable of use, where plaintiff alleged that he never received grievance responses and that officers never filed forms
• holding that the administrative procedures were “prohibitively opaque” in part because the procedures “d[id] not provide guidance on how a transferred inmate can appeal his grievance with the original facility without having received a response”
• holding that the administrative procedures were “prohibitively opaque” in part because the procedures “d[id] not provide guidance on how a transferred inmate can appeal his grievance with the original facility without having received a response”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).