St. Charles Car Co. v. House

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• disapproving $ 2,500 service awards because they were \125 times greater than the $ 20 maximum that any similar Class member could recover\
• enjoining state action after settlement class had been certified, settlement agreement had been submitted to the court for preliminary approval, and court found that “[t]he deficiencies in the Notice and Settlement Agreement are relatively few, and are likely to be remedied”
• “Publication of notice in a national newspaper of wide circulation, plus an online publication, constitutes sufficient notice by publication.”
• “The commonality requirement does not necessitate every class member’s factual or legal situation to be a carbon copy of those of the named plaintiffs, so the low commonality hurdle is easily surmounted.” (internal quotation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).