St. Anthony's High Sch. v. Wainkikainen

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that an \essentially verbatim provision[]\ in the Copyright Remedies Clarification Act was sufficiently clear
• concluding that state officials sued in their individual capacities were entitled to qualified immunity and remanding with instructions to the district court “to dismiss with prejudice” such claims
• addressing petitioner's argument that a report commissioned by Congress showed harm to copyright holders if they were not permitted to sue states for infringement
• suggesting the possibility of future infringement “does not plausibly allege the existence of an ongoing violation of federal law”
• discussing exceptions to state sovereign immunity for state waivers or Congressional abrogation
• declaring that “we affirm the judgment below”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).