Skip to main content
· 7/6/2000

St. Ansgar Mills, Inc. v. Streit

Citations

  • 613 N.W.2d 289
  • 42 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. 2d (West) 58
  • 2000 Iowa Sup. LEXIS 136
  • 2000 WL 895226

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • collecting cases, from various jurisdictions, holding that the determination of reasonableness under the UCC is a factual question inappropriate for summary judgment.
  • reversing a grant of summary judgment in case involving question whether a delay in sending written confirmation of an oral contract was reasonable under the parties' course of dealing
  • reversing a grant of summary judgment in case involving question whether a delay in sending written confirmation of an oral contract was reasonable under the parties’ course of dealing
  • applying the UCC statute of frauds in a dispute regarding the sale of corn
  • applying UCC statute of frauds in a dispute regarding the sale of corn
  • “[A] writing is still required [under § 2-201(2) ], but it does not need to be signed by the party against whom the contract is sought to be enforced.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cady, Neuman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.