Skip to main content
· 4/21/1992

ST. ANNE-NACKAWIC PULP, CO. v. Research-Cottrell, Inc.

Citations

  • 788 F. Supp. 729
  • 17 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. 2d (West) 699
  • 1992 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5245
  • 1992 WL 46605

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • discussing the result reached in Cincinnati, Ohio v Dorr-Oliver, Inc, 659 F Supp 259 [D Conn, 1986]
  • describing situation where “the statute of limitations would start to run before,” inter alia, “plaintiff could sue” as “an absurd result”
  • discussing the result reached in Cincinnati v. Dorr-Oliver, Inc., 659 F.Supp. 259 (D.Conn., 1986)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Mukasey

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.