S.S.M. v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “a written probation order must conform with the trial court’s oral pronouncements at sentencing”
• holding that \a written probation order must conform with the trial court's oral pronouncements at sentencing\
• finding that a “written probation order must conform with the trial court’s oral pronouncements at sentencing”
• “a written probation order must conform with the trial court’s oral pronouncements at sentencing”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Denya
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2010-01-26· cited 23×
• S.D.F. v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2005-09-28· cited 5×
• N.G. v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2011-01-26· cited 2×
• SDF v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2005-09-28