S.S. v. R.D.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that it was error for the appellant’s sentences to be structured so that he would serve the mandatory sentence at the end of his prison term because it deprived the appellant of the possible benefit of control release on the nonmandatory portion of his sentence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).