S.S. Ex Rel. Street v. District of Columbia

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• issue not certified in prehearing order and arising after HOD \presents an entirely new issue which must first be raised in an IDEA administrative complaint\
• “[A] federal plaintiff's 23 [Article III] ‘injury in fact’ may be intangible and need not 24 involve lost money or property . . . a UCL plaintiff's ‘injury in 25 fact’ [must] specifically involve lost money or property.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).