S.S. Ex Rel. Shank v. Howard Road Academy

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that in considering challenge to adequacy of IEP, the test is “not whether, ex post, [the student] can be deemed to have actually derived educational benefits”
• the IDEA does not countenance \ 'Monday Morning Quarterbacking' in evaluating the appropriateness of a child's placement\ (internal quotation marks omitted)
• “Neither the statute nor reason countenance ‘Monday Morning Quarterbacking’ in evaluating the appropriateness of a child’s placement.”
• “Neither the statute nor reason countenance Monday Morning Quarterbacking.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).