Srubar v. Rudd, Rosenberg, Mitofsky & Hollender

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• dismissing Section 1985 claim where the complaint failed to state facts to establish the existence of an invidious motivation or to plead with particularity the existence of a conspiracy
• “Law firms and lawyers ‘are clearly not state entities’ for the purposes of a Section 1983 claim.” (quoting Peavey v. Polytechnic Inst. of New York, 775 F. Supp. 75, 77 (E.D.N.Y. 1991))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).