Srs Technologies v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• rejecting CDA’s applicability because “[w]hat makes this [agency] action unlawful is not contract law”
• rejecting CDA’s applicability and asserting jurisdiction where case rested “on issues of regulatory law, not contract law”
• rejecting CDA’s applicability because “[w]hat makes this [agency] action unlawful is not contract law”
• “Plaintiff is seeking judicial review of agency actions allegedly in violation of agency regulations, the classic case for APA jurisdiction.”
• “[T]his case centers on the interpretation of regulations, a skill district courts are particularly well-suited to perform, and not on any specialized or arcane knowledge of government contracts.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).