· 1/29/2016
Sriram Rajasekaran v. Mark Hazuda
Citations
- 815 F.3d 1095
- 2016 U.S. App. LEXIS 1458
- 2016 WL 362127
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding the court lacked subject matter jurisdiction to review the decision to revoke the plaintiff’s I-140 petition
- “If the statute specifies that the decision is wholly discretionary, regulations or agency practice will not make the decision reviewable.”
- “If the statute specifies that the decision is wholly discretionary, regulations or agency practice will not make the decision reviewable.” (quoting Abdelwahab v. Frazier, 578 F.3d 817, 821 n.6 (8th Cir. 2009))
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Loken, Benton, Shepherd
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.