Skip to main content
· 1/29/2016

Sriram Rajasekaran v. Mark Hazuda

Citations

  • 815 F.3d 1095
  • 2016 U.S. App. LEXIS 1458
  • 2016 WL 362127

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding the court lacked subject matter jurisdiction to review the decision to revoke the plaintiff’s I-140 petition
  • “If the statute specifies that the decision is wholly discretionary, regulations or agency practice will not make the decision reviewable.”
  • “If the statute specifies that the decision is wholly discretionary, regulations or agency practice will not make the decision reviewable.” (quoting Abdelwahab v. Frazier, 578 F.3d 817, 821 n.6 (8th Cir. 2009))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Loken, Benton, Shepherd

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.