Square v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• enhanced penalty statutes are reformatory in nature
• enhanced penalty statutes are reformatory in nature

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

18 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Rogers v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1960-03-23· cited 67×
• Square v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1942-11-11· cited 40×
• Rodriguez v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 4th Dist. (San Antonio)· 2000-09-27· cited 39×
• Wheat v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1969-04-30· cited 32×
• Guilliams v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1953-10-21· cited 18×
• Ex Parte Daniels
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1952-11-12· cited 13×
• Alvarez v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1971-09-23· cited 12×
• Ex Parte Balas
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1967-02-15· cited 9×
• Harrison v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1943-01-06· cited 9×
• Cuellar v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1947-12-03· cited 9×
• Linley v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1973-11-14· cited 6×
• Stover v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1943-02-24· cited 6×
• Simpson v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1950-11-01· cited 5×
• Romines v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1950-05-03· cited 4×
• Andrews v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1966-10-26· cited 4×
• Puckett v. Ellis
  E.D. Texas· 1958-01-06· cited 3×
• Faulwell v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1969-11-05· cited 2×
• Jackson v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1958-02-19· cited 1×

Cites

1 case in this archive is cited by this case.

• Mullins v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1940-11-13· cited 11×