Spurlock v. Nynex

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that complaint was deficient because the plaintiff failed to provide specific dates establishing FMLA leave eligibility
• noting that the complaint was deficient when it failed to allege specific dates establishing FMLA eligibility
• holding that EEOC exhaustion is required in ADA claims
• dismissing FMLA claim in part because the plaintiff did not specifically address the statutory requirements to establish that the defendant was an employer
• finding complaint insufficiently pled where it failed to allege dates demonstrating plaintiff’s eligibility for FMLA leave or dates on when his leave was denied
• explaining plaintiff did not show that defendant was an employer under the FMLA because his pleadings failed to “allege that defendant employ[ed] fifty or more employees for each working day of twenty or more calendar workweeks in the current or proceeding calendar year”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).