Skip to main content
· 3/2/1995

Spurlock v. Demby

Citations

  • 48 F.3d 1219
  • 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 11238
  • 1995 WL 89003

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “[T]he [pro se] litigant still must meet the general requirements of Rule 11”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.