· 7/30/1996
Spurlock v. Alexander
Citations
- 343 N.C. 753
- 473 S.E.2d 619
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “[T]o the extent a claim for restitution is based upon an implied- in-law contract, rather than an implied-in-fact contract, the claim falls outside of the Claims Court's Tucker Act jurisdiction.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.