Skip to main content
· 7/30/1996

Spurlock v. Alexander

Citations

  • 343 N.C. 753
  • 473 S.E.2d 619

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “[T]o the extent a claim for restitution is based upon an implied- in-law contract, rather than an implied-in-fact contract, the claim falls outside of the Claims Court's Tucker Act jurisdiction.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.