Skip to main content
· 6/4/1981

Spungin v. Chinetti International Motors

Citations

  • 515 F. Supp. 31
  • 1981 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12610

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding defendant’s assertion of an interest in the property satisfied the minimum contacts rule for purposes of in rem jurisdiction

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Neaher

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.