· 6/4/1981
Spungin v. Chinetti International Motors
Citations
- 515 F. Supp. 31
- 1981 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12610
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding defendant’s assertion of an interest in the property satisfied the minimum contacts rule for purposes of in rem jurisdiction
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Neaher
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.