Spry v. Professional Employer Plans

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that judge of compensation claims “departed from the essential requirements of law by ordering discovery without considering evidence as to its relevance”
• holding that judge of compensation claims “departed from the essential requirements of law by ordering discovery without considering evidence as to its relevance”
• holding JCC departed from essential requirements of law by requiring disclosure of financial documents without considering evidence regarding relevancy of information
• explaining that “disclosure of the requested information will cause irreparable harm, simply because it is financial information”
• explaining that the “disclosure of . . . information will cause irreparable harm, simply because it is financial information” (citing Friedman v. Heart Inst. of Port St. Lucie, Inc., 863 So. 2d 189, 194 (Fla. 2003))
• granting certiorari relief from disclosure of irrelevant financial information and recognizing the Florida constitutional protections from inappropriate release of such information

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).