Spry v. California

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that, in the context of a Rule 41(g) motion, the government failed to demonstrate a continuing interest to retain seized property where its basis for possessing it could be readily satisfied by other means, such as through photocopies or photographs

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).