Sprowl v. Kellar

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a two-year gap between the board decision and the reconsideration request was not reasonable and did not reset the limitations period
• stating that “on the record before the court it cannot be concluded that, upon his separation, plaintiff possessed the level of knowledge required to cause a claim for disability retirement pay to accrue at that point, absent Board action or refusal to act”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).