Skip to main content
· 2/24/2000

Sproul v. Town of Boothbay Harbor

Citations

  • 2000 ME 30
  • 746 A.2d 368
  • 2000 Me. 30
  • 2000 Me. LEXIS 32

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that as fact-finder, the Planning Board “is allowed to weigh the evidence and make a decision based upon its perception of the evidence.”
  • stating that Planning Board must weigh evidence and make its own determination as to credibility
  • stating that abutters need allege only “a potential for particularized injury to satisfy the standing requirement”
  • finding “[t]he threshold requirement for an abutter to have standing is minimal” because a party appealing as an abutter “need only allege a potential for particularized injury to satisfy the standing requirement”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Wathen, Clifford, Rudman, Dana, Saufley, Alexander, Calkins

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.