· 3/2/1964
Sprott v. Roberts
Citations
- 390 P.2d 465
- 154 Colo. 252
- 1964 Colo. LEXIS 424
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that judge's failure to note time and date of filing upon document and timely transmit it to clerk as required by Colorado Rule of Civil Procedure 5(e) 1 not to be held against party filing document
- holding that judge's failure to note time and date of filing upon document and timely transmit it to clerk as required by Colorado Rule of Civil Procedure 5(e) 1 not to be held against party filing document
- judge’s failure to transmit papers to clerk as required by 5(e) not to be held against party filing them
- judge’s failure to transmit papers to clerk as required by 5(e) not to be held against party filing them
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Sutton
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.