Skip to main content
· 9/26/1979

Sprinzen v. Supreme Court of State of NJ

Citations

  • 478 F. Supp. 722
  • 1979 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9574

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “Plaintiffs contend that . . . we should adopt the general definition of ‘administer’ which is ‘to manage.’ . . . Looking at the plain, unambiguous meaning of ‘where the [ERISA] plan is administered’, we find that plaintiffs’ construction . . . is correct.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Stewart

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.