Sprinkler Irrigation Co., Inc. v. JOHN DEERE INS. COMPANY, INC.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding sanctions were proper when attorney’s brief was “virtually void of any citation to the transcript and record relied upon” and thus “failed to conduct a reasonable inquiry that the appeal be well grounded in fact and warranted by existing law as required” by the appellate rules
• holding sanctions were proper when Smith’s brief was “virtually void of any citation to the transcript and record relied upon” and thus “failed to conduct a reasonable inquiry that the appeal be well grounded in fact and warranted by existing law as required” by the appellate rules
• holding sanctions were proper when Smith’s brief was “virtually void of any citation to the transcript and record relied upon” and thus “failed to conduct a reasonable inquiry that the appeal be well grounded in fact and warranted by existing law as required” by the appellate rules
• argument that verified complaint furnished sufficient, material facts to rebut a motion for summary judgment would not be considered on appeal where it was not argued below
• argument that verified complaint furnished sufficient, material facts to rebut a motion for summary judgment would not be considered on appeal where it was not argued below
• where the plaintiff did not argue to the trial court that its verified complaint provided sufficient ma terial facts to counter the defendant’s motion for summary judgment, this Court would not consider that argument on appeal

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).