Sprinkle v. SB&C LTD.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that the defendant violated the WCAA after finding that the 19 defendant violated a similar provision of the FDCPA
• allowing an FDCPA claim to proceed because “[t]he present lawsuit 16 challenges debt collection practices that led to the judgment, not the judgment itself”
• applying the requirements of § 3931 (then § 521) to a garnishment action
• compliance with the SCRA affidavit requirement “is a prerequisite to the entry of judgment for the plaintiff. . . .”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).