Springston v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• affirming a conviction for possession of marijuana despite scientific test results that the “presence or absence of THC could not be confirmed” because “lay testimony may provide substantial evidence of the identity of a controlled substance”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• David New v. Dale Denver
  Eighth Circuit· 2015-05-29· cited 31×
• Bobby Kellensworth v. State of Arkansas
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 2021-01-21· cited 16×

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Moser v. State
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 1977-10-24· cited 14×
• Blair v. State
  Court of Appeals of Arkansas· 1985-09-18· cited 6×
• Armstrong v. State
  Court of Appeals of Arkansas· 1982-05-19· cited 4×