Skip to main content
· 8/4/1992

Springs v. United States

Citations

  • 614 A.2d 1
  • 1992 D.C. App. LEXIS 208
  • 1992 WL 186624

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting, however, that the trial judge “should not attempt to decide the merits of any defense put forward[ ]”
  • affirming trial judge’s denial of presentence motion to withdraw plea where appellant claimed that he had not been in the “right frame of mind” and made what was virtually a bald assertion of innocence
  • affirming trial judge's denial of presentence motion to withdraw plea where appellant claimed that he had not been in the \right frame of mind\ and made what was virtually a bald assertion of innocence
  • allowing the judge to reject the claim of innocence because “[t]he government’s proffer together with appellant’s sworn statements made at the time of the pleas provided a factual context which overwhelms appellant’s lame and unsupported claims of non-culpability”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Steadman, Wagner, and King, Associate Judges

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.