· 8/4/1992
Springs v. United States
Citations
- 614 A.2d 1
- 1992 D.C. App. LEXIS 208
- 1992 WL 186624
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting, however, that the trial judge “should not attempt to decide the merits of any defense put forward[ ]”
- affirming trial judge’s denial of presentence motion to withdraw plea where appellant claimed that he had not been in the “right frame of mind” and made what was virtually a bald assertion of innocence
- affirming trial judge's denial of presentence motion to withdraw plea where appellant claimed that he had not been in the \right frame of mind\ and made what was virtually a bald assertion of innocence
- allowing the judge to reject the claim of innocence because “[t]he government’s proffer together with appellant’s sworn statements made at the time of the pleas provided a factual context which overwhelms appellant’s lame and unsupported claims of non-culpability”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Steadman, Wagner, and King, Associate Judges
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.