Skip to main content
· 12/23/1983

Springs Mills, Inc. v. Ultracashmere House, Ltd., and Bart Schwartz

Citations

  • 724 F.2d 352
  • 221 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 577
  • 1983 U.S. App. LEXIS 14185

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • district court should have considered availability of award of attorneys' fees even though plaintiff had not shown lost sales
  • district court should have considered availability of award of attorneys’ fees even though plaintiff had not shown lost sales
  • “the district court, of course, has a continuing obligation of enforcing the injunctive order by the power of contempt, if necessary”
  • “Further, short of modifying the injunction, the district court, of course, has a continuing obligation of enforcing the injunctive order by the power of contempt, if necessary.”
  • “district court did not err in devising an appropriate limited injunction”
  • no error in District Court's limited injunction mandating a disclaimer

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Kaufman, Meskill, Pierce

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.