· 12/23/1983
Springs Mills, Inc. v. Ultracashmere House, Ltd., and Bart Schwartz
Citations
- 724 F.2d 352
- 221 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 577
- 1983 U.S. App. LEXIS 14185
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- district court should have considered availability of award of attorneys' fees even though plaintiff had not shown lost sales
- district court should have considered availability of award of attorneys’ fees even though plaintiff had not shown lost sales
- “the district court, of course, has a continuing obligation of enforcing the injunctive order by the power of contempt, if necessary”
- “Further, short of modifying the injunction, the district court, of course, has a continuing obligation of enforcing the injunctive order by the power of contempt, if necessary.”
- “district court did not err in devising an appropriate limited injunction”
- no error in District Court's limited injunction mandating a disclaimer
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Kaufman, Meskill, Pierce
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.