Springfield Industrial Bldg. Co. v. Commissioner

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that LFO errors do not render a judgment and sentence facially invalid for purposes ofRCW 10.73.090(1), nor was Blazina a significant change in the law requiring retroactive application under 4 No. 34221-2-III State v. Aguilar RCW 10.73.100(6)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).