Springfield Hosp., Inc., Springfield Med. Care Sys., Inc. v. Guzman

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that not every public social discussion between a judge and a lawyer requires an evidentiary hearing to determine whether the judge's impartiality can be questioned
• stating that not every public social discussion between a judge and a lawyer requires an evidentiary hearing to determine whether the judge’s impartiality can be questioned
• stating that a motion to recuse a judge filed after trial is presumptively untimely
• no right to jury trial in shareholder derivative action, which “has traditionally been considered an equitable proceeding,” where plaintiff “primarily sought equitable relief”
• defendants sought recusal “almost two years after the entry of judgment in favor of the plaintiff”
• failure to raise disqualification in timely fashion may render motion \inherently suspect\ or waive issue in some circumstances

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).