Springfield Grocer Co. v. Shackelford

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• remanding to the Appellate Panel because the Appellate Panel's findings were insufficient to enable meaningful review and to ascertain whether the evidence supported the findings
• \The findings of fact made by the Appellate Panel must be sufficiently detailed to enable the reviewing court to determine whether the evidence supports the findings.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).