Springfield Card Manufacturing Co. v. West

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that “if the issue is only mentioned in passing and not supported by any cogent argument or authority, it cannot be considered”
• explaining that the pro se appellant’s “ultimate goal” on appeal was clear, but without any cogent argument or authority, the Court could not reach the merits of his appeal
• refusing to consider the merits of a pro se appellant’s appeal where his opening brief lacked citations to the record, citations of applicable authority, and comprehensible argument
• refusing to consider the merits of a pro se appellant’s appeal where his opening brief lacked citations to the record, citations of applicable authority, and comprehensible argument

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).