Skip to main content

Springer v. State

Citations

  • 798 N.E.2d 431
  • 2003 Ind. LEXIS 944
  • 2003 WL 22594363

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that “‘there is no definition of reasonable or ordinary care that encompasses the circumstance of an uninvited person seeking confrontation in the occupied residence of another person, while wielding a loaded, cocked weapon without the safety mechanism engaged’”
  • “Defendant’s negligence argument is simply a statement that the State failed to prove that he was reckless. No additional instruction to the jury on this point was required.”
  • upon review of a refusal to give a tendered instruction, we consider “whether there is evidence in the record to support the giving of the instruction”
  • defen- dant’s substantial rights were not prejudiced by the lack of an accident instruction
  • “Negligence, as used by Defendant here, is an argument not a legal defense.”
  • “[The Court] reasoned that ‘were the jury to decide that the shooting was a result of an accident, there is no question that the jury could not find that he was reckless.’ We adopt the opinion of the Court of Appeals on this point.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Dickson, Shepard, Boehm, Rucker

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

17 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.