Skip to main content

Springer v. State

Citations

  • 940 S.W.2d 322
  • 1997 Tex. App. LEXIS 565
  • 1997 WL 53283

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding because neither the defendant nor his counsel objected to the court appointing another attorney to represent the defendant at his probation revocation hearing, the defendant waived his complaint
  • holding because neither the defendant nor his counsel objected to the court appointing another attorney to represent the defendant at his probation revocation hearing, the defendant waived his complaint
  • holding because neither the defendant nor his counsel objected to the court appointing another attorney to represent the defendant at his probation revocation hearing, the defendant waived his complaint
  • holding because neither the defendant nor his counsel objected to the court appointing another attorney to represent the defendant at his probation revocation hearing, the defendant waived his complaint

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Ovard, Maloney, Wright

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

15 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.