Skip to main content
· 8/25/1998

Springer v. Partners in Care

Citations

  • 17 F. Supp. 2d 133
  • 1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13423
  • 75 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 45,938
  • 1998 WL 546588

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that a delay of about ten years before filing a Title VII claim was not unreasonable as a matter of law
  • affirming EEOC’s authority to issue a right-to-sue letter more than ten years after the NYSDHR had issued a no probable cause determination in a former employee’s Title VII action alleging discrimination
  • “[M]ere eonclusory assertions as to anticipated difficulties in putting on a defense are not sufficient to constitute prejudice for purposes of establishing laches.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Trager

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.