Spring Creek Living Center v. Sarrett

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• reiterating that it is incumbent upon a plaintiff to identify an expert and attach an affidavit or deposition testimony or a physician to respond to a defendant’s motion for summary judgment
• claims based on alleged failure to provide needed medical care are dependent upon expert testimony
• “[C]laims based on allegations of a failure to provide needed medical care and attention . . . come within the ambit of the Medical Malpractice Act and are dependent upon expert testimony.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).