Spriggs v. Public Service Com'n of Maryland

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that placement in “objectionable offices” was not adverse employment action
• disposing of plaintiff’s disparate enforcement claim because plaintiff failed to offer any evidence that any other employee was treated differently with respect to discipline or working conditions
• “Because plaintiff has not demonstrated that the AWOL charge carried negative consequences for her, it does not constitute an adverse employment action.”
• “reversed or rescinded actions . . . cannot form the basis for . . . liability under the employment discrimination laws”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).