Sprewell v. Thompson & Hutson, South Carolina, LLC

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “to make a ‘showing’ Nos. 23AP-221 & 23AP-222 4 that a meritorious defense exists, ‘the defendant must provide factual information and may not rely solely on conclusions.’ ”
• counsel’s affidavit amounted to nothing more than general denial that defendant was not indebted to plaintiff
• trial court did not err in determining that law firm was entitled to recover attorney fees and expenses associated with its work in collection action
• this court’s decision must be made on record and not upon briefs of counsel
• “In such affidavit, the only attempt counsel made in setting out a defense was a general denial that [defendant] was not indebted to [the plaintiff]. Such conclusionary statements cannot constitute the showing of a meritorious defense.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).