New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 2/14/2005
Sprenger v. Trout
Citations
- 866 A.2d 1035
- 375 N.J. Super. 120
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding the CFA applied to the \business of customizing and refabricating automobiles\
- declining to apply the unclean hands doctrine where plaintiff's alleged wrong was against his employer, not against defendants
- rejecting “roadworthiness” limitation and noting that “[c]ourts have consistently rejected creative attempts to narrow the scope of the [statute] by technical definitions and artificial distinctions”
- rejecting “roadworthiness” limitation and noting that “[c]ourts have consistently rejected creative attempts to narrow the scope of the [statute] by technical definitions and artificial distinctions”
- declining to apply the unclean hands doctrine where plaintiff's alleged wrong was against his employer, not defendants whom he hired to repair and customize his vehicle
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Judges Newman, Axelrad and Holston, Jr.
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
5 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Francis E. Parker Memorial Home, Inc. v. Georgia-Pacific LLCD. New Jersey· 2013-05-20· cited 46×
- All the Way Towing, LLC v. Bucks Cnty. Int'l, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey· 2019-01-24· cited 28×
- NJ Mfrs. Ins. Co. v. Prestige Health Group, LLCNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 2009-04-06· cited 22×
- Maguire v. MohrmannNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 2007-12-13· cited 3×
- Al Poller and Deb Poller v. Okoboji Classic Cars, LLCSupreme Court of Iowa· 2021-06-04
Cites
18 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Manalapan Realty v. Township Committee of the Township of ManalapanSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1995-06-06· cited 2,534×
- Cox v. Sears Roebuck & Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey· 1994-09-15· cited 404×
- Sears Mortgage Corp. v. RoseSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1993-07-29· cited 187×
- Polk Bros., Inc. v. Forest City Enterprises, Inc.Seventh Circuit· 1985-11-26· cited 104×
- Lettenmaier v. Lube Connection, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey· 1999-12-01· cited 74×
- Skeer v. EMK Motors, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1982-12-08· cited 55×
- Bernstein v. BD. OF TRUST. TEACHERS'PEN. & ANN. FUNDNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1977-06-27· cited 55×
- Leon v. Rite Aid Corp.New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 2001-05-30· cited 53×
- Marascio v. CampanellaNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1997-03-20· cited 53×
- Heuer v. HeuerSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1998-01-08· cited 48×
- Fair Automotive Repair, Inc. v. Car-X Service System, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois· 1984-10-26· cited 47×
- Scibek v. LongetteNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 2001-04-05· cited 30×
- Huffmaster v. RobinsonNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1986-03-30· cited 27×
- Fruhling v. County of ChampaignAppellate Court of Illinois· 1981-04-24· cited 25×
- Levin v. LewisNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1981-04-30· cited 24×
- Chow v. Aegis Mortgage Corp.N.D. Illinois· 2003-10-07· cited 15×
- Joe D'Egidio Landscaping, Inc. v. ApicellaNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 2001-02-13· cited 11×
- Messeka Sheet Metal v. HodderNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 2004-04-01· cited 8×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.