Spreckels v. Brown

Citations

• 212 U.S. 208
• 29 S. Ct. 256
• 53 L. Ed. 476
• 1909 U.S. LEXIS 1806

Syllabus

<p>Although the Supreme Court of Hawaii has not authority to enter a final judgment which is reviewable by’ this court when the case is before it on bill of exceptions it may do so when a writ of error has brought up-the judgment. Cotton v. Hawaii, 211 U. S. 162, distinguished.</p> <p>Tax returns are not conclusive as to values. Where it sufficiently appears by-affidavits in the record and in this court that the value of the land.involved exceeds the jurisdictional amount, the case will not be dismissed on a motion based on lower valuations in tax returns.</p> <p>In Hawaii a disseisee may convey to a stranger, and a deed purporting to remise, release and forever quit claim amounts to a conveyance of all the grantor’s interest in the property at the time.</p> <p>While the words “sea beach” taken in á strict sense might not include a small strip outside of the metes and bounds specified in an Hawaiian deed, where by natural interpretation the grant conveyed all the upland to low water mark, and with it all accretions, this court will not reverse a ruling of the lower court to that effect.</p> <p>In a deed to property in Hawaii monuments shown in a diagram held to prevail, in case of discrepancy, over metes and bounds.</p> <p>The party having the burden of proof is not entitled to a reversal because the jury was charged to find against him unless satisfied that he had clearly proved his case even though the word “ clearly ” be slightly overemphasized. Ward v. Cochran, 150 U. S. 597.</p> <p>Where articles indicating the judge’s leanings appear in a newspaper, and one of the parties informs the judge that he need not give any instructions to the jury as to reading the paper, the verdict cannot be set aside because similar articles subsequently appeared in other papers which may have been read by members of the jury.</p> <p>The admission of affidavits of jurymen to efféct that they had not been influenced by newspaper articles held to be immaterial, the order overruling t