Skip to main content
· 9/23/1996

Spraytex, Inc. v. Djs&t and Homax Corporation

Citations

  • 96 F.3d 1377
  • 35 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 1116
  • 40 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1145
  • 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 24892
  • 1996 WL 537699

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • discussing various views of federal circuits regarding the same concept of appealability in context of the analogous federal rule (Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b))
  • “Absent Rule 54(b) certification, there may be no appeal of a judgment disposing of fewer than all aspects of a consolidated case.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Rich, Lourie, Clevenger

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.