Spraying Systems Company v. Delavan, Incorporated

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that a leading survey design “created a bias in favor of identifying a single company” as the source of the products and therefore the survey results could not prove secondary meaning
• affirming summary judgment based on finding that consumer survey of secondary meaning was too flawed to create a genuine issue of material fact
• finding the suffix “JET” descriptive of a hose product based in part on fifty other registrations using “JET” to de- scribe similar high-velocity water stream products
• finding the suffix “JET” descriptive of a hose product based in part on fifty other registrations using “JET” to de- scribe similar high-velocity water stream products
• finding the suffix “JET” descriptive of a hose product based in part on fifty other registrations using “JET” to de- scribe similar high-velocity water stream products
• finding the suffix “JET” descriptive of a hose product based in part on fifty other registrations using “JET” to de- scribe similar high-velocity water stream products

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).