Spratlen v. Spratlen

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• relying on Kettering to hold that the predecessor to section 14-10-122(2) “require[d] an express statement that alimony [would] continue after remarriage”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).