Spraigue v. Thompson
Citations
- 118 U.S. 90
- 6 S. Ct. 988
- 30 L. Ed. 115
- 1886 U.S. LEXIS 1907
Syllabus
<p>Section 1513 of the code of Georgia which provides that “ any person, master, or commander of a ship or vessel bearing toward any of the ports or harbors of this State, except coasters in this State, and between the ports of this State and those of South Carolina, and between the ports of this State and those of Florida, who refuses to receive a pilot on board, shall be liable, on his arrival in such port in this State, to pay the first pilot who may have offered his services outside the bar, and exhibited his license as a pilot, if demanded by the master, the full rates of pilotage established by law for such vessel,” conflicts with the Constitution of the United States, and is annulled and abrogated by the provision in Rev. Stat. § 4337, that “ no regulations or provisions shall be adopted- by any State which shall make any discrimination in the rate of pilotage orhalf-pilotage between vessels sailing between the ports of one State and vessels sailing between the ports of different States, or any discrimination against , vessels propelled in whole or in part by steam, or against national vessels of the United States ; and all existing regulations or provisions making any such discrimination are annulled and abrogated.”</p> <p>A vessel owned in Philadelphia and running between Philadelphia and Savannah was licensed as a coastwise steam vessel. The master held a license as pilot under Title LTI. Rev. Stat. The owners employed S (a Savannah pilot also licensed under the laws of the United States to conduct vessels over Tybee Bar and up the Savannah River), as their regular pilot to conduct the vessel through those waters, with pay from the time of leaving Philadelphia. T, licensed as a pilot under the laws of Georgia, spoke the vessel of£ Cape Romain, before any other pilot spoke it, and tendered his services to conduct it over the bar and up the river, and they were refused. Subsequently S met the vessel under the general arrangement and piloted it over the bar a
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that the “insuperable difficulty” in severing an illegal exception from a statute “is that, by rejecting the exceptions intended by the legislature ..., the statute is made to enact what confessedly the legislature never meant”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Matthews
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.