· 4/10/1990
Sprague v. Kaplan
Citations
- 572 A.2d 789
- 392 Pa. Super. 257
- 1990 Pa. Super. LEXIS 862
- 1990 WL 42040
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that consortium claims are only valid when a spouse is injured after the couple is married
- holding that consortium claims are only valid when a spouse is injured after the couple is married
- “Loss of consortium has been recognized in this Commonwealth as a right evolving out of the marriage relationship and is grounded on the loss of a spouse’s service after injury.”
- “Loss of consortium has been recognized [Pennsylvania] as a right evolving out of the marriage 12 IV. CONCLUSION Based on the forgoing, Defendants’ motions for summary judgment are GRANTED. (Doc. 35; Doc. 39
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Wieand, Tamilia, Popovich
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.